Bowen v. 224 Realties, LLC et al
| Daniel Bowen |
| 224 Realties, LLC, Fenbin Chen, d/b/a No. 1 Pioneer Chinese Restaurant a/k/a Pioneer Restaurant, Fenbin Chen and Pioneer Restaurant |
| 1:2019cv11813 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to 224 Realties, LLC..(dnh) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Fenbin Chen..(dnh) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to 224 Realties, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Daniel Bowen..(Ramirez, Hector) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Fenbin Chen, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Daniel Bowen..(Ramirez, Hector) |
Filing 3
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FOR CASES FILED UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the undersigned for an Initial Pretrial Conference ("IPTC") in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on April 24, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 443 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, 10007. The Defendant(s)' time to move against or answer the Complaint is stayed until the date of the IPTC, unless otherwise ordered. Plaintiffs are encouraged to serve defendants promptly. Plaintiff's counsel, or the defendant's counsel in removed cases, is responsible for distributing copies of this Notice to all parties. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 4/24/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 443, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Valerie E. Caproni. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 12/30/2019) (ama)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Hector V. Ramirez. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Fenbin Chen, d/b/a No. 1 Pioneer Chinese Restaurant a/k/a Pioneer Restaurant. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: alias party was entered incorrectly. (dnh) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions. (dnh) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Ramirez, Hector) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 224 Realties, LLC, Fenbin Chen, d/b/a No. 1 Pioneer Chinese Restaurant a/k/a Pioneer Restaurant. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18369485)Document filed by Daniel Bowen.(Ramirez, Hector) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
