Toliver v. The City of New York et al
Michel Toliver |
Project Renewal Anna's Place, Radulovick, Ms. Graham, The City of New York, Project Renewal Fort Washington, Mr. Mendoza, Judy Malloy, Dr., Dept. of Homeless Services and John/Jane Doe |
1:2019cv11834 |
December 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Colleen McMahon |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application to Michel Toliver 464 Hudson St. #222 New York, NY 10014. (vba) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/30/2019) (va) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 4 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (va) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Dept. of Homeless Services, Graham, John/Jane Doe, Judy Malloy, Dr, Mendoza, Project Renewal Anna's Place, Project Renewal Fort Washington, Radulovick, The City of New York. Document filed by Michel Toliver.(rdz) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Michel Toliver.(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.