McIntosh v. United States of America
Case Number: 1:2019cv11966
Filed: January 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER denying 16 MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER EQUITABLE TOLLING TO RESPOND TO THE COURT DECISION ON 2255. Movant's motion to reopen or reconsider the denial of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied substantially for the reaso ns set forth in the government's papers [DI 1562 and 1486] and the declaration of Attorney James Bell [DI 1548]. The Court notes that movant was directed to file any response to the latest submissions by the government and Mr. Bell within thirt y days of February 8, 2021 but failed to do so. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and close the case. A certificate of appealability is denied, and the Court certifies that any appeal herefrom would not be taken in good faith within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/30/2021) (mml)
February 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: Movant is directed to file any reply to the government's further response to his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion within 30 days of the date of this order. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to movant and so note on the docket sheet. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 2/8/2021) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
October 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: No papers having been received on or before October 7, 2020, the Court declines to reconsider its June 11, 2020 ruling denying movant's Section 2255 motion. Dkt 1504, 16-cr-0212 (LAK). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 10/11/2020) Copy mailed to Jaquan McIntosh by First Class Mail. (js)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying without prejudice 5 Application for the Court to Request Counsel. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/25/2020) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (Kaplan, Lewis) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The government shall respond to movant's motion [DI 3] no later than April 6, 2020. Its response should include the government's position as to whether the motion is timely. The government's attention is drawn to the statement i n movant's earlier petition [DI 1] concerning lockdown(s) at Big Sandy. Defendant shall file his reply, if any, within 30 days of the date that the government files its response. (Responses due by 4/6/2020) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/5/2020) (jwh)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Petitioner's December 16, 2019 letter the Court was accepted as a motion under 18 U.S.C. §2255 and the caption and docket number above has been assigned. The Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner copies of the motion forms f or a 2255 habeas petition and the pro bono appointment of counsel along with a copy of this order. Petitioner is directed to utilize the forms and file them as amended motions with the Clerk of Court no later than February 28, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 2/28/2020.) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 1/8/2020) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McIntosh v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?