Fluent, LLC v. Hernandez et al
| 1:2019mc00029 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Other |
| M 08-85 Motion to Quash |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
OPINION & ORDER re: 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE INITIATING DOCUMENT - MOTION to Quash Subpoena to Produce Documents . Other Court Name: United States District Court - Northern District of Illinois. Other Court Case Number: 1:18- cv-06756. (Filing Fee $ 47.00, Receipt filed by Fluent, LLC.) For the foregoing reasons, and to the extent indicated herein, the Court will enforce in part, while quashing in part, Hernandez's Subpoena directed at records of third-party Fluent. Subject to any orders by the Northern District of Illinois modifying this schedule, Fluent shall produce the requested documents within the next three weeks (i.e., no later than May 28, 2019). The Court respectfully requests that the Clerk of Court terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 1 and close this case in this District. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 5/7/2019) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fluent, LLC v. Hernandez et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
