Perez v. Gee Vee Trucking, Inc. et al
| Edwin H Perez |
| Gee Vee Trucking |
| JOHAN A. BONILLA-GOMEZ |
| 1:2020cv00691 |
| January 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Mary Kay Vyskocil |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Johan A. Bonilla-Gomez, Gee Vee Trucking, Inc...(dnh) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Gee Vee Trucking, Inc. and Johan Bonilla-Gomez, re: #5 Complaint. Document filed by Edwin H Perez..(Soffey, Joseph) |
| Transmission to Attorney Services/Help Desk. Transmitted re: Case Reopened, #6 Notice of Application to Reopen Case, #4 Amended Civil Case Administrative Closing Order, to Attorney Services/Help Desk for case processing..(pne) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Joseph E. Soffey to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the summons request is linked to a pleading that was not accepted by the Court; link the summons request to the properly filed pleading at Document No. #5 . Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the summons form PDF. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (wb) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Judge Colleen McMahon is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO REOPEN CASE: Pursuant to Amended Standing Order (15-MC-131):. The deficiency(ies) has been cured and the party(ies) seek to reopen the civil case..(Soffey, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Johan A. Bonilla-Gomez, Gee Vee Trucking, Inc.. Document filed by Edwin H Perez..(Soffey, Joseph) |
Filing 4
AMENDED CASE OPENING ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING ORDER: New civil actions filed electronically that contain the following deficiencies may be administratively closed without prejudice and summonses may not be issued unless the deficiency is corrected within five (5) days of electronic transmission by the Clerk of a Notice of Deficient Filing: The case initiating document contains the wrong document - an illegible or unreadable document or no document.. Where a new civil action is administratively closed for a reason listed above and the party cures the deficiency within 60 days of the case closing, the party should seek to reopen the case by electronically filing a Notice of Application to Reopen Case through the ECF system. Such Notice shall describe the efforts to cure the deficiency and seek to reopen the case. The Clerk shall review such Notice and, if the deficiency is satisfactorily cured, reopen and randomly reassign the case. Applications to reopen such administratively closed cases filed after 60 days of closing must proceed by motion. Administrative Reopening due by 4/6/2020. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/7/2017) (pne)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Colleen McMahon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pne) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Joseph E. Soffey to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct; the PDF must contain the COMPLAINT only; the first page of the PDF must be removed. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the corrected PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 2/4/2020. (pne) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Gee Vee Trucking, Inc. and Johan A. Bonilla-Gomez, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Edwin H Perez. (Soffey, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Soffey, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - COMPLAINT against JOHAN A. BONILLA-GOMEZ, Gee Vee Trucking. Document filed by Edwin H Perez.(Soffey, Joseph) Modified on 1/30/2020 (pne). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO FILE CIVIL INITIAL PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Joseph E. Soffey to electronically file the initial pleading in this case. Failure to file the initial pleading may result in the dismissal of the case pursuant to Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131. Initial Pleading due by 2/3/2020. (pne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
