Aurora Commercial Corp. et al v. Aurora Commercial Corp.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Aurora Commercial Corp. et al v. Aurora Commercial Corp.

Aurora Commercial Corp. et al v. Aurora Commercial Corp.

Appellee:	Aurora Commercial Corp.
Appellant:	NanCy M. Horner
Case Number:	1:2020cv00742
Filed:	January 28, 2020
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge:	Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit:	Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 0158
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 1, 2021	Filing 48 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Bankruptcy Court's decision is affirmed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/1/2021) (rj)
February 3, 2020	Filing 5 ORDER: Appellee's request to transfer this action to Judge Koeltl, who is presiding over a bankruptcy appeal against the same Appellee, is DENIED. Pursuant to Local Rule 13, "[b]ankruptcy appeals are deemed related if they arise from the same order or judgment of the bankruptcy court." This action and the one before Judge Koeltl arose from separate orders of the bankruptcy court. Thus, for this reason and the fact that the appeal will tum on the merits of the individual foreclosure at issue here, this action will not be transferred. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/3/2020) (cf)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 1, 2021

Filing 48 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Bankruptcy Court's decision is affirmed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/1/2021) (rj)

February 3, 2020

Filing 5 ORDER: Appellee's request to transfer this action to Judge Koeltl, who is presiding over a bankruptcy appeal against the same Appellee, is DENIED. Pursuant to Local Rule 13, "[b]ankruptcy appeals are deemed related if they arise from the same order or judgment of the bankruptcy court." This action and the one before Judge Koeltl arose from separate orders of the bankruptcy court. Thus, for this reason and the fact that the appeal will tum on the merits of the individual foreclosure at issue here, this action will not be transferred. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/3/2020) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aurora Commercial Corp. et al v. Aurora Commercial Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellee: Aurora Commercial Corp.
Represented By:	Kyle James Ortiz
Represented By:	Albert Togut
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellant: NanCy M. Horner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?