Vivi Holding Eastern Corp et al v. Wong et al
Plaintiff: Shao Lung Huang and Vivi Holding Eastern Corp
Defendant: STY & WKY Inc., Rockville Vivi Tea, Inc. and Kei Yung Wong
Case Number: 1:2020cv01110
Filed: February 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Paul G Gardephe
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint on consent. The Application is granted. SO ORDERED. Rockville Vivi Tea, Inc. answer due 4/24/2020; STY & WKY Inc. answer due 4/24/2020; Kei Yung Wong answer due 4/24/2020. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 3/26/2020) (jca)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint on consent addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Farzad Ramin dated March 25, 2020. Document filed by Rockville Vivi Tea, Inc., STY & WKY Inc., Kei Yung Wong..(Ramin, Farzad)
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Rockville Vivi Tea, Inc., STY & WKY Inc., Kei Yung Wong..(Ramin, Farzad)
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Farzad Ramin on behalf of Rockville Vivi Tea, Inc., STY & WKY Inc., Kei Yung Wong..(Ramin, Farzad)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(sj)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rockville Vivi Tea, Inc., STY & WKY Inc., Kei Yung Wong..(sj)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Court for an initial pretrial conference in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on June 11, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 705 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) MUST: (i) IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ALL ATTORNEYS IN THIS ACTION BY SERVING UPON EACH OF THEM COPIES OF THIS NOTICE AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES; AND (ii) SEND A COPY OF SUCH NOTICE TO CHAMBERS (without attachments). IF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) IS UNAWARE OF THE IDENTITY OF COUNSEL FOR ANY OF THE PARTIES, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) MUST IMMEDIATELY SEND COPIES OF THE NOTICE AND INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO THAT PARTY PERSONALLY. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Seven days before the conference, the parties must submit a joint letter addressing the following in separate paragraphs: (1) a brief description of the case, including the factual and legal bases for the claim(s) and defense(s); (2) any contemplated motions; and (3) the prospect for settlement. For the Court's convenience, the parties must set forth the conferences date and time in the joint letters opening paragraph. The Court directs the parties to consult its Individual Practices and model Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order both of which are available on the Court's web site and to submit with their joint letter a jointly proposed Case Management Plan. So Ordered. (Initial Conference set for 6/11/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 705, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe.) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 2/11/20) (yv)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to KEI YUNG WONG, STY & WKY INC., and ROCKVILLE VIVI TEA, INC., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Shao Lung Huang, Vivi Holding Eastern Corp..(Chen, Hui)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Chen, Hui)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to KEI YUNG WONG, STY & WKY INC., and ROCKVILLE VIVI TEA, INC., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Shao Lung Huang, Vivi Holding Eastern Corp..(Chen, Hui) Modified on 2/10/2020 (jgo).
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Shao Lung Huang, Vivi Holding Eastern Corp..(Chen, Hui)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Chen, Hui) Modified on 2/10/2020 (jgo).
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Chen, Hui)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rockville Vivi Tea, Inc., STY & WKY Inc., Kei Yung Wong. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18744008)Document filed by Vivi Holding Eastern Corp, Shao Lung Huang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit).(Chen, Hui)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Hui Chen to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Courthouse Assignment code - no selection;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated June 2017. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated June 2017 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Hui Chen. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 15:44; Fee Date 2/8/2020;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 15:1114; the Fee Date has been modified to 2/10/2020;. (jgo)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Hui Chen to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the date field on the offical A.O. Summons form was completed by the attorney;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vivi Holding Eastern Corp et al v. Wong et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STY & WKY Inc.
Represented By: Farzad Ramin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rockville Vivi Tea, Inc.
Represented By: Farzad Ramin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kei Yung Wong
Represented By: Farzad Ramin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shao Lung Huang
Represented By: Hui Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vivi Holding Eastern Corp
Represented By: Hui Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?