Irving H. Picard v. Estate of Seymour Epstein et al
| Irving H. Picard |
| Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc., Jane Epstein, Randy Epstein Austin, Herbert C. Kantor, Estate of Seymour Epstein, Robert Epstein, Muriel Epstein and Susan Epstein Gross |
| Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC |
| 1:2020cv01377 |
| February 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. § 157 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on #16 Letter filed by Randy Epstein Austin, Jane Epstein, Muriel Epstein, Robert Epstein, Estate of Seymour Epstein, Susan Epstein Gross, Herbert C. Kantor, Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: In light of Defendants' decision not to bring a motion to withdraw the bankruptcy reference, there is nothing more for this Court to do in this case. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/12/2020) (mro) |
| Filing 16 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Helen Davis Chaitman dated August 12, 2020 re: Bankruptcy Court Proceedings. Document filed by Randy Epstein Austin, Jane Epstein, Muriel Epstein, Robert Epstein, Estate of Seymour Epstein, Susan Epstein Gross, Herbert C. Kantor, Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc...(Chaitman, Helen) |
Filing 15
ORDER. As discussed on the record during the telephone conference held on July 29, 2020, Plaintiff's motion to withdraw the reference to the bankruptcy court and accompanying papers is due by August 10, 2020. Defendant's opposition is due two weeks following service of Plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff's reply is due one week following service of Defendant's opposition. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Gregory H. Woods) (Text Only Order) (Daniels, Anthony)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gregory H. Woods: Telephone Conference held on 7/29/2020. (Daniels, Anthony) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER. The Court will hold a conference in this case on July 29, 2020 at 1 p.m. The parties are directed to consult the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Court's website, for dial-in information and other instructions. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Gregory H. Woods) (Text Only Order) (Daniels, Anthony)
|
| Filing 13 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Nicholas J. Cremona dated July 27, 2020 re: Response to Defendants' Letter dated July 24, 2020. Document filed by Irving H. Picard..(Cremona, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Helen Davis Chaitman dated July 24, 2020 re: in accordance with this Courts order dated July 22, 2020 (ECF No. 11). Document filed by Randy Epstein Austin, Jane Epstein, Muriel Epstein, Robert Epstein, Estate of Seymour Epstein, Susan Epstein Gross, Herbert C. Kantor, Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc...(Chaitman, Helen) |
| Filing 11 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #10 Letter, filed by Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc., Jane Epstein, Susan Epstein Gross, Randy Epstein Austin, Estate of Seymour Epstein, Robert Epstein, Herbert C. Kantor, Muriel Epstein. ENDORSEMENT: Defendants are directed to submit a pre-motion conference letter more fully setting out the bases for the proposed motion. The letter should address why the Court should not refer the proposed motion to dismiss to the bankruptcy court for a report and recommendation. The Court expects that Plaintiff will submit a responsive letter after Defendants have submitted their pre-motion conference letter. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/22/2020) (mro) |
| Filing 10 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Helen Davis Chaitman dated July 22, 2020 re: Defendants' Motion. Document filed by Randy Epstein Austin, Jane Epstein, Muriel Epstein, Robert Epstein, Estate of Seymour Epstein, Susan Epstein Gross, Herbert C. Kantor, Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc...(Chaitman, Helen) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #1 Motion to Withdraw Bankruptcy Reference. In light of the Court's prior order, Dkt No. 8, the motion to withdraw the bankruptcy reference, Dkt No. 1, is denied without prejudice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Gregory H. Woods)(Text Only Order) (Daniels, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: On February 18, 2020, Defendants submitted a motion to withdraw the bankruptcy reference. Dkt No. 1. The Court understands that Plaintiff intends to move for summary judgment on at least some claims in the underlying action. The Court thus declines to withdraw the bankruptcy reference and will instead refer the proposed motion for summary judgment for proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/8/2020) (mro)
|
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. #7 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. (dt) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Muriel Epstein, Estate of Seymour Epstein, Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc.. Related Document Number: #5 ..(Chaitman, Helen) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. On March 6, 2020, the parties submitted a proposed order on consent to withdraw the reference from the Bankruptcy Court. That order has not been signed by the parties. The parties are directed to resubmit their proposed order with appropriate signatures. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Gregory H. Woods) (Text Only Order) (Daniels, Anthony)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Helen D. Chaitman dated March 6, 2020 re: Consent to Withdraw the Reference from the Bankruptcy Court. Document filed by Muriel Epstein, Estate of Seymour Epstein, Herbert C. Kantor, Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order).(Chaitman, Helen) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: #1 MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE BANKRUPTCY REFERENCE. Bankruptcy Court Case Numbers: 10-4438A, 08-1789A (SMB). filed by Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc., Estate of Seymour Epstein, Muriel Epstein. On February 18, 2020, Defendants submitted a motion to withdraw the bankruptcy referee. Dkt No. 1. Plaintiff is directed to file its opposition to the motion no later than March 12, 2020. Defendants' reply, if any, is due one week following service of Plaintiff's opposition., Responses due by 3/12/2020 (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 2/19/2020) (rj)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Judge Lewis J. Liman is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nicholas J. Cremona on behalf of Irving H. Picard..(Cremona, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(bkar) |
| Filing 1 MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE BANKRUPTCY REFERENCE. Bankruptcy Court Case Numbers: 10-4438A, 08-1789A (SMB).Document filed by Estate of Seymour Epstein, Shelburne Shirt Company, Inc., Muriel Epstein. (Attachments: #1 Defendants Memorandum of Law In Support, #2 Declaration of Helen Davis Chaitman, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Proposed Order).(bkar) |
| Case Designated ECF. (bkar) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (bkar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
