Washington v. Schneiderman et al
Plaintiff: Landon Lamont Washington
Defendant: State of New York, Board of Parole, Andrea Evans and Hon. Eric Schneiderman
Case Number: 1:2020cv01550
Filed: February 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Referring Judge: Louis L Stanton
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2020 Mailed a copy of #6 Order of Dismissal, #7 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), (Notoce of Right to appeal) to Landon Lamont Washington at NYSID: 01930776N, B&C No. 3491901974, 16-00 Hazen Street, East Elmhurst, NY 11370..(ml)
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CIVIL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the order issued April 3, 2020, dismissing this action, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action is dismissed. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 because Plaintiff seeks monetary relief from defendants that are immune from such relief and because he fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (iii). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254 because the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider those claims. Because Plaintiff's complaint makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that chambers mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 4/3/20) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rdz) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/6/2020: #1 Supplement) (rdz).
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court dismisses this action. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 because Plaintiff seeks monetary relief from defendants that are immune from such relief and because he fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (iii). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254 because the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider those claims. Because Plaintiff's complaint makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. This order is to be mailed by chambers. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 4/3/20) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rdz)
April 2, 2020 Mailed a copy of #5 Order Granting IFP Application in Prisoner Case, to Landon Lamont Washington, NYSID: 01930776N, B&C No. 3491901974; Otis Bantum Correctional Center, 16-00 Hazen Street, East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (sac)
April 2, 2020 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Colleen McMahon is no longer assigned to the case. (laq)
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION IN PRISONER CASE: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees is granted. A prisoner bringing a civil action is required to pay the full $350 filing fee even when proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees.... The Court must collect, when funds exist in a prisoner's account, an initial partial filing fee plus monthly payments. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order and the prisoner authorization to the agency having custody of Plaintiff. That agency is directed to forward copies of Plaintiff's prison trust fund account statements for the past six months and to disburse the payments required under 28 U.S.C. 1915 to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and to include the above docket number on the disbursement before sending it to the Court. If Plaintiff is transferred to another facility, the current facility shall provide a copy of this order to the facility to which he is transferred. The Clerk of Court is also directed to send a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Finally, it is Plaintiff's obligation to promptly submit a written notification to the Court if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 4/1/2020) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
March 6, 2020 Filing 4 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Landon Lamont Washington..(sc)
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: Plaintiff is directed to submit a completed and signed Prisoner Authorization Form to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Prisoner Authorization Form due by 3/26/2020. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on February 25, 2020) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Authorization) (jjg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
February 25, 2020 Mailed a copy of #3 Order Directing Prisoner Authorization, to Landon Lamont Washington NYSID: 01930776N B&C No. 3491901974 Otis Bantum Correctional Center) 16-00 Hazen Street East Elmhurst, NY 11370..(vba)
February 25, 2020 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb)
February 20, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Board of Parole, Andrea Evans, Eric Schneiderman, State of New York. Document filed by Landon Lamont Washington. (sac)
February 20, 2020 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Landon Lamont Washington. (sac)
February 20, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Schneiderman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Landon Lamont Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of Parole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrea Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hon. Eric Schneiderman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?