Liberty Highrise Pvt. Ltd v. Praxis Energy Agents DMCC et al
Plaintiff: LIBERTY HIGHRISE PVT. LTD.
Defendant: Praxis Energy Agents Pte Ltd. and Praxis Energy Agents DMCC
Case Number: 1:2020cv02427
Filed: March 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 ad
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #8 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. Plaintiff's motion for issuance of a letter rogatory is therefore denied. If Plaintiff establishes that there is no speedier or less costly alternative means of service available, it may renew its motion for issuance of a letter rogatory. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 8. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/20/2020) (rj)
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #8 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory as to Praxis Energy Agents Pte Ltd. in Singapore . . Document filed by Liberty Highrise Pvt. Ltd...(Wanchoo, Rahul)
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory as to Praxis Energy Agents Pte Ltd. in Singapore . Document filed by Liberty Highrise Pvt. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Letter Rogatory, #2 Text of Proposed Order).(Wanchoo, Rahul)
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Praxis Energy Agents Pte Ltd...(jgo)
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Praxis Energy Agents DMCC..(jgo)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Praxis Energy Agents DMCC, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Liberty Highrise Pvt. Ltd...(Wanchoo, Rahul)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Praxis Energy Agents Pte Ltd., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Liberty Highrise Pvt. Ltd...(Wanchoo, Rahul)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Rahul Wanchoo. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $326,000. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to none; no dollar demand entered on civil cover sheet. (pne)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pne)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (pne)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pne)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Rahul Wanchoo. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Liberty Highrise Pvt. Ltd. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps. (pne)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Wanchoo, Rahul)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by LIBERTY HIGHRISE PVT. LTD...(Wanchoo, Rahul)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Praxis Energy Agents DMCC, Praxis Energy Agents Pte Ltd.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-19169813)Document filed by LIBERTY HIGHRISE PVT. LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11).(Wanchoo, Rahul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty Highrise Pvt. Ltd v. Praxis Energy Agents DMCC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LIBERTY HIGHRISE PVT. LTD.
Represented By: Rahul Wanchoo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Praxis Energy Agents Pte Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Praxis Energy Agents DMCC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?