Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. Adamany et. al.
Case Number: 1:2020cv02775
Filed: April 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 AMENDED OPINION & ORDER: The Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Section 14(a). Because amendment would be futile, see Document Techs., Inc. v. LDiscovery, LLC, 731 F. App'x 31, 33 (2d Cir. 2018), the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 21 and 28 and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 10/5/2022) (jca)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 33 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Jefferies Financial Group Inc., Jeffreies, Alan J. Hirschfield, Barry J. Alperin, Brian P. Freidman, Francisco L. Borges, Jacob M. Katz, James E. Jordan, Jeffrey C. Keil, Jessee Cly de Nichols, III, Joseph S. Steinberg, Linda L. Adamany, MaryAnne Gilmartin, Michael Sorkin, Michael T. O'Kane, Paul M. Dougan, Richard B. Handler, Robert D. Beyer, Robert E. Joyal, Stuart H. Reese, W. Patrick Campbell against Stanley Rubenste in. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 28, 2022, the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Section 14(a). Because amendment would be futile, see D ocument Techs., Inc. v. LDiscovery, LLC, 731 F. App'x 31, 33 (2d Cir. 2018), the Court has GRANTED the motion to dismiss; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 9/29/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER re: 21 MOTION to Dismiss Sole Remaining Claim (Count IV) in Plaintiff's Shareholder Derivative Complaint. filed by Jacob M. Katz, Linda L. Adamany, Joseph S. Steinberg, Michael T. O'Kane, Jefferies Financi al Group Inc., Francisco L. Borges, Stuart H. Reese, Jessee Clyde Nichols, III, W. Patrick Campbell, Michael Sorkin, Robert E. Joyal, MaryAnne Gilmartin, Richard B. Handler, Paul M. Dougan, Robert D. Beyer, Jeffrey C. Keil, Brian P. Freidman, Jame s E. Jordan, Alan J. Hirschfield, Barry J. Alperin, 28 MOTION to Dismiss Sole Remaining Claim (Count IV) in Plaintiff's First Amended Shareholder Derivative Complaint. filed by Jacob M. Katz, Linda L. Adamany, Joseph S. Steinberg, M ichael T. O'Kane, Jefferies Financial Group Inc., Francisco L. Borges, Stuart H. Reese, Jessee Clyde Nichols, III, W. Patrick Campbell, Michael Sorkin, Robert E. Joyal, MaryAnne Gilmartin, Richard B. Handler, Paul M. Dougan, Robert D. Beyer , Jeffrey C. Keil, Brian P. Freidman, James E. Jordan, Alan J. Hirschfield, Barry J. Alperin.The Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Section 14(a). Because amendment would be futile, see Document Techs., Inc. v. LDiscovery, LLC, 731 F. Ap p'x 31, 33 (2d Cir. 2018), the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 21 and 28 and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 9/28/2022) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. Adamany et. al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?