Genao v. Lewis & Lin LLC
| Elvin Genao |
| Lewis & Lin LLC |
| 1:2020cv02839 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order of Dismissal, #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), Pro Se Appeal Package to Edwin Genao, 237W 127th, Apt. 14C, New York, NY 10027. (sac) |
Filing 3
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under the June 5, 2019 order in Genao v. Saint Pauls Church, ECF 1:19-CV-2704, 6 (S.D.N.Y. June 5, 2019), the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 4/8/2020) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/13/2020: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac).
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. He has not paid the relevant fees to bring this action or applied to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis ("IFP"). By order dated June 5, 2019, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil action in this Court IFP without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Genao v. Saint Pauls Church, ECF 1:19-CV-2704, 6 (S.D.N.Y. June 5, 2019). Because Plaintiff has not paid the relevant fees, it appears that he wishes to proceed IFP. Plaintiff has not sought leave to file, and the Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the June 5, 2019 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 4/8/2020) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lewis & Lin LLC. Document filed by Elvin Genao. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Genao v. Lewis & Lin LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elvin Genao | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lewis & Lin LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
