Eliaas et al v. The Dinex Group, LLC et al
| 1:2020cv03117 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that, no later than July 2, 2021, Plaintiffs' counsel shall: (1) File a letter setting forth a description of what is included as part of the "Investigation" expenses and providing a breakdown of each compo nent of such expenses; and (2) Send a Microsoft Word version of the Proposed Order filed at ECF No. 83-1 to the Court via email at Aaron_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 6/26/2021) (Aaron, Stewart)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER: NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that, no later than April 8, 2021, Plaintiffs' counsel shall: File a revised form of Notice, as follows: As set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 4/01/2021) (ama)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER: NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that, no later than April 6, 2021, Plaintiffs' counsel shall: File a fully executed version of the Settlement Agreement; File the form of Notice of Proposed Settlement (No tice) that is referred to in Sections 1.20 and 2.3(C) of the Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A;2 File a letter addressing the following questions: As further set forth in this order. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 3/30/2021) (js)
|
|
Filing
62
NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: This case has been reassigned to the undersigned. All counsel must familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-p-cronan. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 12/1/2020) (kv)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER re: 53 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Luis Panura, Jose Peralta, Rafael Estrella, Nicholas Gringas, Kaity Chan-Roman, Sultan Ahmed, Carlos Soto, Barbara Eliaas, Primitivo Flores, Hector Siguencia, Efren Perez, Jorge V elasquez. The Court is in receipt of the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) from a number of Plaintiffs in this case. ECF No. 53. It is an open question in this Circuit whether parties may settl e [] cases without court approval or DOL supervision by entering into a Rule 41(a)(1)(A) stipulation without prejudice. Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 201 n.2 (2d Cir. 2015); see also Amadis v. Newcastle Realty Servs., LLC, No. 17-CV-8116, 2018 WL 2727350 (S.D.N.Y. May 10, 2018). The Parties should submit a joint status report, in writing, by July 10, 2020 informing the Court about whether the resolution of this case as to the Plaintiffs who filed the notice of voluntary d ismissal is the result of a settlement between the Parties. If there was indeed a settlement between the Parties, they should also submit Letter Briefs, not to exceed five pages, that discuss whether Court approval is needed for the settlement by July 10, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/26/2020) (kv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eliaas et al v. The Dinex Group, LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
