Chubb Seguros Peru S.A. et al v. M/V As Fortuna, her engines, boilers, etc. et al
1:2020cv03392 |
November 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 mc Marine Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 ORDER re: 97 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,, filed by Chubb Seguros Peru S.A., Intcomex Peru SAC, XL Catlin Services SE, Saint Gobain Peru, S.A., Ingram Micro SAC. Plaintiffs are directed to file a letter by August 7, 2023 indicating whether the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal disposes of the entire case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 8/4/2023) (kv) |
Filing 93 ORDER: On March 31, 2022, the Hon. Andrew L. Carter, Jr., ordered Plaintiffs to show cause as to why Onboard Logistics USA Inc. should not be dismissed (ECF No. 92). Plaintiffs have not responded to the show cause order and have not since otherwis e appeared on the docket. Plaintiffs have until December 14, 2022 to respond to the Court's show cause order. The Court warns Plaintiffs that failing to prosecute their case, including by failing to respond to the show cause order, may result in this Court recommending to Judge Carter that Plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo on 11/30/2022) ( Show Cause Response due by 12/14/2022.) (ks) |
Filing 92 OPINION AND ORDER re: 55 MOTION to Dismiss Shipco Transport Inc.. filed by Shipco Transport Inc., 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by JAS Forwarding Services (Ireland) Limited. For the reasons above, the Court G RANTS Defendants Shipco Transport, Inc. and JAS Forwarding Services (Ireland) Limited d/b/a Blue World Line's motions. The Court also dismisses Defendant As Fortuna Opco B.V. Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause why Onboard Logistics USA Inc. should not be dismissed. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at ECF Nos. 55 and 63, and terminate Defendants Shipco Transport, Inc., JAS Forwarding Services (Ireland) Limited d/b/a Blue World Line, and As Fortuna Opco B.V. SO ORDERED. As Fortuna Opco B.V., As Fortuna Opco B.V., As Fortuna Opco B.V., JAS Forwarding Services (Ireland) Limited, JAS Forwarding Services (Ireland) Limited, JAS Forwarding Services (Ireland) Limited, Shipco Transport Inc., Shipco Transport Inc., Shipco Transport Inc., Shipco Transport Inc., As Fortuna Opco B.V. and As Fortuna Opco B.V. terminated. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/31/2022) (jca) |
Filing 50 ORDER: Defendants Shipco Transport Inc. and JAS Forwarding Services (Ireland) Limited request a pre-motion conference in anticipation of a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint pursuant to Feder l Rules of Civil Procedure 12(c), 19, and 56. Plaintiffs shall respond by February 17, 2021. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 2/15/2021) (js) |
Filing 45 ORDER: Defendants request a pre-motion conference in anticipation of a motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs shall respond by November 13, 2020. SO ORDERED., ( Responses due by 11/13/2020) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 11/11/2020) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chubb Seguros Peru S.A. et al v. M/V As Fortuna, her engines, boilers, etc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.