John Roe et al v. City of New York et al
| Jane Roe 1, Jane Roe 2 and John Roe |
| John Doe, Michael Sensese, Robert Kselman, John & Jane Does 1-30, Eugene Porcaro, Jason Brochhausen, Nitin Savur, Dermont F. Shea, James P. O'Neill, Sergeant Kim, David O'Keefe, Jewel McCollin, Carlos M. Gomez, Dennis Calascibetta, Kathleen Walsh, Bonnie Sard, City of New York, Jane and John Does, Fredrick Loeffler, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Terrence A. Monahan, John Allen, Robert Ryan, Kalawski, Howard Metzdorff, Derick J. Bentley, William Bratton and Michael Magliano |
| 1:2020cv04059 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against John Allen, Derick J. Bentley, William Bratton, Jason Brochhausen, Dennis Calascibetta, City of New York, Carlos M. Gomez, Jane and John Does, John & Jane Does 1-30, John Doe, Kalawski, Kim, Robert Kselman, Fredrick Loeffler, Michael Magliano, Jewel McCollin, Howard Metzdorff, Terrence A. Monahan, David O'Keefe, James P. O'Neill, Eugene Porcaro, Robert Ryan, Bonnie Sard, Nitin Savur, Michael Sensese, Dermont F. Shea, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. Document filed by Jane Roe 1, John Roe, Jane Roe 2..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by John Roe.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
