Cruz v. Red Wing Brands of America, Inc.
| Shael Cruz |
| Red Wing Brands of America, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv04426 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Engelmayer |
| Katharine H Parker |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; granting #10 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference: The Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint is hereby extended to September 10, 2020. The telephonic Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. is hereby rescheduled to Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 12:30 p.m. Counsel is directed to call Judge Parker's teleconference line at the scheduled time. Please dial (866) 434-5269, Access code: 4858267. (Red Wing Brands of America, Inc. answer deadline set for 9/10/2020. Initial Conference set for 10/8/2020 at 12:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 8/4/2020) (jwh)
|
| Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker from Joseph J. DiPalma dated 08/04/2020., LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker from Joseph J. DiPalma dated 08/04/2020. Document filed by Red Wing Brands of America, Inc...(DiPalma, Joseph) |
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #11 Memo Endorsement - Deleted by Chambers - To be refiled.. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (ca) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker)(Text Only Order) (Parker, Katharine)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . Document filed by Red Wing Brands of America, Inc...(DiPalma, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph James DiPalma on behalf of Red Wing Brands of America, Inc...(DiPalma, Joseph) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE ORDER: Initial Conference set for 9/9/2020 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. Counsel is directed to call the court's telephone conference line at the scheduled time. Please dial (866) 434-5269, Access Code: 4858267. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 6/24/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. The parties are hereby notified that this Court has written on a legal issue that appears central to this case: the applicability of the ADA to websites. See Del-Orden v. Bonobos, Inc., No. 17 Civ. 2744 (PAE), 2017 WL 6547902 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2017). (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/23/2020) (jwh)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Red Wing Brands of America, Inc...(jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Red Wing Brands of America, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Shael Cruz..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Red Wing Brands of America, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-20188286)Document filed by Shael Cruz..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cruz v. Red Wing Brands of America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Red Wing Brands of America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph James DiPalma |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shael Cruz | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
