Betts v. Sixty Lower East Side, LLC et al
Case Number: 1:2020cv04772
Filed: January 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity Action

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on 28 denying Motion to Quash. ENDORSEMENT: Application denied. The parties are directed to confer and agree upon a mutually convenient date for Mr. Maynard's deposition. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/16/2021) (ama)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER: granting 26 Letter Motion to Compel. Plaintiff Margaret Bettss Letter Motion to Compel Valeryia Vasilets to Appear for a Remote Video Deposition (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED. Valeryia Vasilets is ordered to appear for her remote video deposition in this matter on or before February 8, 2021. Valeryia Vasilets is further ordered to provide Plaintiff's counsel with adate certain for her deposition and the necessary contact information, including e-mail address, to conduct the remote video deposition on or before January 26, 2021. Valeryia Vasilets's failure to comply with this order may subject her to contempt. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 1/21/2021) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Betts v. Sixty Lower East Side, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?