Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Clara Lopez |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
1:2020cv04843 |
June 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Sarah Netburn |
Gregory H Woods |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security..(dnh) |
Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Clara Lopez..(Buckley, Robert) |
Mailed a copy of #7 Order, to Civil Division United States Attorneys Office Southern District of NY at Civil Division United 86 Chambers Street New York, NY 10007. (aan) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties should follow the schedule set forth in the Standing Order at ECF No. 4. Requests for extensions of the deadlines set by this scheduling order may be granted by the Court, but only if they are made in advance of the deadline, and there is good reason provided for the request. Such requests shall be submitted in accordance with the Individual Practices of Judge Netburn, available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Netburn. The parties shall advise the Court as to whether they jointly consent to decision of this action by this United States magistrate judge. If both parties consent, they should complete the counterparts of the Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge available on the Court's website at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consent-to-proceed-before-us-magistrate- judge and submit them to my chambers. If either or both parties do not consent, the assigned Assistant United States Attorney shall act as a liaison and report to chambers that the parties do not consent, without indicating any particular party's consent or non-consent. (In other words, the Court does not want to know that party A consents and party B does not.) This Order is not meant to interfere in any way with the parties absolute right to decision by a United States district judge but is merely an attempt at preserving scarce judicial resources and a reminder of the parties' options under 28 U.S.C. 636(c).The Clerk of Court is ordered to send this order to the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York. All other provisions as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 7/2/2020) (js) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/1/2020) (mro) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/1/2020) (mro) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Filing 3 FIRST MOTION for Leave to Proceed Informa Pauperis . Document filed by Clara Lopez..(Buckley, Robert) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO PAY THE FILING FEE. Notice to Attorney Robert Cornelius Buckley. Civil Case Opening Fee of $400 Due: for #1 Complaint. The filing fee due was not paid; either in whole or in part. If the filing fee is not paid within five (5) days, per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-131, this case will be administratively closed. Filing Fee due by 6/30/2020..(jgo) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Buckley, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Clara Lopez..(Buckley, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.