Carroll v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Carroll v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC

Carroll v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC

Case Number:	1:2020cv04918
Filed:	February 17, 2021
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action:	09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 18, 2021	Filing 25 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 24 Memorandum & Opinion. in favor of Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC against Kevin Joseph Carroll in the amount of $ 732,673.41. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 17, 2021, Petitioner Carroll's motion to vacate the award (Doc 4) is DENIED; Respondent Wells Fargo's cross-motion to confirm the award (Doc 15) is GRANTED; final judgment is entered for Respondent Wells Fargo in the amount $715,654.41 plus attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $17,019. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 2/18/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)
February 17, 2021	Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 4 FIRST MOTION to Vacate Arbitration. filed by Kevin Joseph Carroll, 15 CROSS MOTION to Confirm Arbitration and Opposition to Petition to Vacate filed by Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. Petitioner Carroll's mo tion to vacate the award (Doc 4) is DENIED. Respondent Wells Fargo's cross-motion to confirm the award (Doc 15) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter final judgment for Respondent Wells Fargo in the amount $715,654.41 plus attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $17,019. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/17/2021) (ama) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Date Filed

Document Text

February 18, 2021

Filing 25 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 24 Memorandum & Opinion. in favor of Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC against Kevin Joseph Carroll in the amount of $ 732,673.41. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 17, 2021, Petitioner Carroll's motion to vacate the award (Doc 4) is DENIED; Respondent Wells Fargo's cross-motion to confirm the award (Doc 15) is GRANTED; final judgment is entered for Respondent Wells Fargo in the amount $715,654.41 plus attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $17,019. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 2/18/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)

February 17, 2021

Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 4 FIRST MOTION to Vacate Arbitration. filed by Kevin Joseph Carroll, 15 CROSS MOTION to Confirm Arbitration and Opposition to Petition to Vacate filed by Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. Petitioner Carroll's mo tion to vacate the award (Doc 4) is DENIED. Respondent Wells Fargo's cross-motion to confirm the award (Doc 15) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter final judgment for Respondent Wells Fargo in the amount $715,654.41 plus attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $17,019. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/17/2021) (ama) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carroll v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?