Miranda Franco et al v. Mi Barrio Meat Market Inc. et al
| 1:2020cv04983 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER: This case contains claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On September 29, 2021, the parties submitted their proposed settlement agreement and related papers. (ECF No. 41.) On October 12, 2021 an Order was issued on the parties' c onsent referring disposition of this matter to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 44.) Having reviewed the proposed settlement, the Court finds that it is fair and reasonable. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, In c., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The settlement is approved. Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs except as may be stated in the settlement agreement. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. So Ordered (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 10/14/2021) (js)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting 39 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/28/2021) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: granting 37 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/16/2021) (ama)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER: The Court has been advised that the parties in this FLSA action have reached a settlement. See Dkt. No. 34.Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, if the settlement is to take effect, the Court must first rev iew and scrutinize the agreement to ensure that it is fair. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015); see also Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 338 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). Accordingly, on or before Septem ber 16, 2021, the parties must submit to the Court both the settlement agreement and a joint letter explaining why the settlement should be approved. The parties' submission should contain the following: and further set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/16/2021) (rro)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER: In light of the COVID-19 public health crisis, the Court will not hold the upcoming initial pretrial conference in this case in person. Counsel should submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter seven days prior to the sch eduled conference, as directed in the Court's Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference. In their joint letter, the parties should also indicate whether they can do without a conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear. If not, the Court will hold the initial pretrial conference by telephone, albeit perhaps at a different time than the currently scheduled time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint letter all times on the date of the scheduled conference that they would be available for a telephone conference. In either case, counsel should review and comply with the Court's Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-alison-j-nathan.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/26/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Plaintiff dated 9/23/2020. Document filed by Jesus Miranda Franco (on behalf of others similarly situated), Jesus Miranda Franco (individually). The init ial pre-trial conference in this matter is hereby adjourned to November 6, 2020 at 3 p.m. Plaintiff shall file an update on the status of service within one week of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 11/6/2020 at 03:00 PM before Judge Alison J. Nathan). (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/24/2020) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: In light of the COVID-19 public health crisis, the Court will not hold the upcoming initial pretrial conference in this case in person. Counsel should submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter seven days prior to the schedu led conference, as directed in the Court's Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference. In their joint letter, the parties should also indicate whether they can do without a conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear. If not, the Court will hold the initial pretrial conference by telephone, albeit perhaps at a different time than the currently scheduled time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint lett er all times on the date of the scheduled conference that they would be available for a telephone conference. In either case, counsel should review and comply with the Courts Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon alison-j-nathan. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/23/2020) (kv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miranda Franco et al v. Mi Barrio Meat Market Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
