Weatherley 39th Street, LLC v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff: Weatherley 39th Street, LLC
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv05244
Filed: July 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Andrew L Carter
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 rl
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2020 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc...(Gerber, Steven)
September 3, 2020 Filing 10 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Macy's, Inc., Other Affiliate Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC for Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.. Document filed by Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc...(Gerber, Steven)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. SO ORDERED., Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. answer due 9/3/2020. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/30/2020) (rj)
July 29, 2020 Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Steven Gerber, Esq. dated July 29, 2020. Document filed by Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc...(Gerber, Steven)
July 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven Gerber on behalf of Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc...(Gerber, Steven)
July 10, 2020 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc...(dnh)
July 9, 2020 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Weatherley 39th Street, LLC..(Scherer, Martin)
July 9, 2020 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Scherer, Martin)
July 9, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Martin William Scherer to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): information for plaintiff's attorney was omitted; court name was omitted. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the corrected summons form PDF. (pne)
July 9, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pne)
July 9, 2020 Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pne)
July 9, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (pne)
July 9, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Martin William Scherer to RE-FILE Document. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the civil cover sheet. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the PDF. (pne)
July 9, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Martin William Scherer. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $140,000,000. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to none; no dollar demand entered on civil cover sheet. (pne)
July 8, 2020 Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Weatherley 39th Street, LLC..(Scherer, Martin) Modified on 7/9/2020 (pne).
July 8, 2020 Filing 2 FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Weatherley 39th Street, LLC..(Scherer, Martin)
July 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-20603972)Document filed by Weatherley 39th Street, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet).(Scherer, Martin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weatherley 39th Street, LLC v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Steven Gerber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Weatherley 39th Street, LLC
Represented By: Martin William Scherer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?