Guevara v. Goodnight Group LLC et al
||December 17, 2020
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
|Nature of Suit:
||Labor: Fair Standards
|Cause of Action:
||29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 28, 2021
ORDER denying without prejudice 21 Motion for Default Judgment. The Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment on April 28, 2021. While Defendants had not previously appeared in this case, counsel for Defendants filed a notice of appearance on the ECF docket shortly before the hearing began, and then appeared at the hearing. This Order memorializes the Court's rulings at the conference. Plaintiff stated that she wished to withdraw her motion for a default judgment after the appearance of Defendants in this case. Accordingly, the Motion for a Default Judgement [ECF No. 21] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court respectfully is requested to close the motion at ECF No. 21. Counsel for Defenda nts confirmed that she would accept service on behalf of both remaining Defendants in this case (Goodnight Group LLC and Flatiron Room Operations LLC) as well as the previously dismissed Defendant Thomas Tardie. Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint within thirty days of this Order. This deadline will not be extended absent extraordinary circumstances. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 4/28/2021) (rj)
|December 17, 2020
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Complaint in this action was filed on July 10, 2020 [ECF #1]. Certain executed summonses were filed on the docket on November 16, 2020 reflecting that Defendants' responses to the complaint were due October 8, 2020 [E CF #10-12]. No responses were filed, and Plaintiff has not prosecuted this case to date. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued for failure to prosecute without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by January 15, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962)). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 12/17/2020) ( Motions due by 1/15/2021.) (ks)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?