Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC et al
1:2020cv05615 |
July 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 STIPULATED SECOND AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/5/2021) (rro) |
Filing 106 OPINION AND ORDER re: (70 in 1:20-cv-07952-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, (52 in 1:20-cv-07842-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by All ianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, (62 in 1:20-cv-09479-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. filed by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, (82 in 1:20-cv-05615-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. filed by Allianz Global Invest ors U.S. LLC, (44 in 1:20-cv-10028-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, (62 in 1:20-cv-09478-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Allianz Global Investors U. S. LLC, (51 in 1:20-cv-09587-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, (54 in 1:20-cv-05817-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint filed by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LL C, (54 in 1:20-cv-07061-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, (71 in 1:20-cv-07606-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, (70 in 1:20-cv-07154-KPF) MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint filed by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC. For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's motions to dismiss are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in this Opinion. Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to notify the Court, on or before October 30, 2020, regarding whether they will file amended pleadings. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this Opinion in case numbers No. 20 Civ. 5615, No. 20 Civ. 5 817, No. 20 Civ. 7061, No. 20 Civ. 7154, No. 20 Civ. 7606, No. 20 Civ. 7842, No. 20 Civ. 7952, No. 20 Civ. 8642, No. 20 Civ. 9478, No. 20 Civ. 9479, No. 20 Civ. 9587, and No. 20 Civ. 10028. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate the moti ons pending at No. 20 Civ. 5615, Dkt. #82; No. 20 Civ. 5817, Dkt. #54; No. 20 Civ. 7061, Dkt. #54; No. 20 Civ. 7154, Dkt. #70; No. 20 Civ. 7606, Dkt. #71; No. 20 Civ. 7842, Dkt. #52; No. 20 Civ. 7952, Dkt. #70; No. 20 Civ. 9478, Dkt. #62; No. 20 Civ. 9479, Dkt. #62; No. 20 Civ. 9587, Dkt. #51; and No. 20 Civ. 10028, Dkt. #44. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 9/30/2021) (mml) |
Filing 101 ORDER granting 96 Letter Motion to Seal. Application GRANTED. Exhibits 1, 2, and 4-7 to the Declaration of Michael Blatchley in Opposition to Defendant's Omnibus Motion to Dismiss may be filed under seal, visible only to the Court and the parties. Additionally, Plaintiff may redact references to these exhibits in its memorandum of law.. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 4/27/2021) (nb) |
Filing 90 STIPULATED AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... This confidentiality agreement does not bind the Court or any of its personnel. The Court can modify this stipula tion at any time. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the terms and conditions of this agreement only for the pendency of this litigation. Any party wishing to make redacted or sealed submissions shall comply with Rule 6(A) of this Court's Individual Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 4/21/2021) (vf) |
Filing 88 ORDER granting 86 Letter Motion to Seal. Application GRANTED. Due to the sensitive information contained therein, the docket entries specified above shall be sealed, viewable only to the Court and parties. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/26/2021) (nb) |
Filing 73 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... This confidentiality agreement does not bind the Court or any of its personnel. The Court can modify this stipulation at a ny time. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the terms and conditions of this agreement only for the pendency of this litigation. Any party wishing to make redacted or sealed submissions shall comply with Rule 6(A) of this Court's Individual Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this Order in case numbers 20-cv-5615, 20-cv-5817, 20-cv-7061, 20-cv-7154, 20-cv-7606, 20-cv-7842, 20-cv-7952, 20-cv-8642, 20-cv-9478, 20-cv-9479, 20-cv-9587, and 20-cv-10028. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/22/2020) (rro) |
Filing 62 ORDER granting 61 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this Order in case numbers 20-cv-5615, 20-cv-5817, 20-cv-7061, 20-cv-7154, 20-cv-7606, 20-cv-7842, 20-cv-7952, 20-cv-8642, 20-cv-9478, 20-cv-9479, and 20-cv-9587. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/1/2020) (rro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.