Vazquez v. United States of America
Edwin Vazquez |
USA and United States of America |
1:2020cv05697 |
July 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mailed a copy of #3 Endorsed Letter, to Edwin Vazquez, 65285-019, MDC Brooklyn, P.O. Box 329002, Brooklyn, NY 11232.(tn) |
Filing 3 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Edwin Vazquez dated 8/4/2020 re: withdraw 2255 motion. ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. Movant's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Dkt. #1), is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/17/2020) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rro) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 19-cr-540 (KPF).Document filed by Edwin Vazquez.(rdz) |
Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.