Wagoner v. B.H.C.F.
| Tina Lynne Wagoner |
| B.H.C.F. |
| 1:2020cv05775 |
| July 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #4 Notice of Appeal. (tp) |
| Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Tina Lynne Wagoner were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #2 Order of Dismissal. Document filed by Tina Lynne Wagoner. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (tp) |
| Mailed a copy of #3 Judgment, #2 Order of Dismissal, to Tina Lynne Wagoner at DIN No. 16G0694, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility, 247 Harris Road, Bedford Hills, NY 10507-2400. (dsh) |
Filing 3
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP is denied. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 7/28/2020) (Attachments: #1 Appeal Package) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(g): The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court denies Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP, and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act's three-strikes rule. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff remains barred from filing any future action IFP while in custody, unless she is under imminent threat of serious physical injury. Id.The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 7/28/2020) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B.H.C.F. Document filed by Tina Lynne Wagoner. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wagoner v. B.H.C.F. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: B.H.C.F. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tina Lynne Wagoner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
