Hylton v. Decker et al
| Gabrae Hylton |
| Thomas Decker, Acting Sec. of DHS Chad Wolf, William Barr, Director Thomas Decker, Attorney General William Barr and Acting Secretary Chad Wolf |
| 1:2020cv05994 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John G Koeltl |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of Petition for Habeas Corpus. Document filed by Gabrae Hylton..(Mathur, Suchita) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Dare Aniyikaiye in Opposition re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,,. Document filed by William Barr, Thomas Decker, Chad Wolf..(Friedman, Rebecca) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, . Document filed by William Barr, Thomas Decker, Chad Wolf..(Friedman, Rebecca) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, Government Return. Document filed by William Barr, Thomas Decker, Chad Wolf. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice to Appear, #2 Exhibit Notice of Custody Determination, #3 Exhibit Notice of Alien Address, #4 Exhibit DHS Proffer of Evidence, #5 Exhibit Bond Order, #6 Exhibit Bond Decision, #7 Exhibit Removal Order, #8 Exhibit BIA Decision, #9 Exhibit BIA Decision).(Friedman, Rebecca) |
Filing 5
***SELECTED PARTIES*** MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #4 Letter filed by Gabrae Hylton. ENDORSEMENT: The briefing schedule is approved. SO ORDERED., ( Responses due by 8/21/2020, Replies due by 8/28/2020.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 8/05/2020) (ama)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Suchita Mathur dated Aug. 5, 2020 re: Jointly Proposed Briefing Schedule. Document filed by Gabrae Hylton..(Mathur, Suchita) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebecca Ruth Friedman on behalf of William Barr, Thomas Decker, Chad Wolf..(Friedman, Rebecca) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John G. Koeltl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pne) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mathur, Suchita) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. (Filing Fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-20949028)Document filed by Gabrae Hylton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. NTA & Custody Determination, #2 Exhibit B.DHS Proffer of Evidence, #3 Exhibit C. Joseph Hearing Denial & Bond Decision, #4 Exhibit D. Removal Order & Oral Dec. of IJ, #5 Exhibit E. I-130 Approval Notice, #6 Exhibit F. EOIR Portal Case Summary & BIA Notice of Appeal, #7 Exhibit G. Hylton Decl.).(Mathur, Suchita) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
