Kerr v. Barr et al
Petitioner: Kwesi O. Kerr
Respondent: William Barr and Chad Wolf
Case Number: 1:2020cv06037
Filed: July 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Louis L Stanton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2020 Received returned mail re: #4 Order. Mail was addressed to Kwesi O. Kerr at prisoner/DOC # A-209-346-072, LaSalle Correctional Center, 15976 Highway 165, Olla, LA 71465 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return To Sender Refused Unable To Forward. (vn)
August 11, 2020 Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Western District of Louisiana acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 1:20-cv-01023, filed on 08/11/2020. (sjo)
August 6, 2020 Mailed a copy of #4 Order, to Kwesi O. Kerr at prisoner/DOC # A-209-346-072, LaSalle Correctional Center, 15976 Highway 165, Olla, LA 71465. (dsh)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. Whether Petitioner should be permitted to proceed further without payment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. This order closes this case. Because Plaintiff makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 8/4/2020) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
August 4, 2020 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
July 30, 2020 Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION to Stay Order of Removal. Document filed by Kwesi O. Kerr. (sac)
July 30, 2020 Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Document filed by Kwesi O. Kerr. (Attachments: #1 Motion to reopen under special Rule INA 240 (c)(7)(iv) and VAWA 2005, #2 A, #3 B, #4 C, #5 D, #6 E) (sac)
July 30, 2020 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Kwesi O. Kerr.(sac)
July 30, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kerr v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chad Wolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kwesi O. Kerr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?