Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Shaterese Latalia Morris
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv06353
Filed: August 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Kevin Nathaniel Fox
Referring Judge: Lorna G Schofield
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2020 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Letter Regarding Consent to Magistrate Judge for All Purposes served on Shaterese Latalia Morris on October 6, 2020. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(Kim, Elizabeth)
October 6, 2020 Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from AUSA Elizabeth J. Kim dated 10/6/20 re: Parties' Non-Consent to Referral to Magistrate Judge for All Purposes. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(Kim, Elizabeth)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation). Referred to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/22/2020) (jca)
September 21, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth J. Kim on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security..(Kim, Elizabeth)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Shaterese Latalia Morris, at 155-30 Jewel Ave., Apt. 7C, Flushing, NY 11367, on 9/1/2020 Re: #4 Order of Service - Social Security via REGULAR MAIL. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases), in social security cases only, a flyer about pro bono attorneys available through the New York County Lawyers' Association. (bwa)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/1/2020) (cf)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF SERVICE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: The Clerk of Court shall notify the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York of the filing of this pro se case, brought under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for which the filing fee has been waived. In accordance with the Standing Order Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings in Social Security Cases, 16-MC-0171 (Apr. 20, 2016): as further set forth in this Order. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 11/30/2020. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/1/2020) (cf) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
August 10, 2020 Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Shatarese L. Morris consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Shaterese Latalia Morris.(rdz)
August 10, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Shaterese Latalia Morris.(rdz)
August 10, 2020 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Shaterese Latalia Morris.(rdz)
August 10, 2020 Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz)
August 10, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Elizabeth J. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaterese Latalia Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?