Stetson et al v. Stetson
| Nathan Yovu, Peter Stetson, Katherine Stetson, Jason Yovu, Charles Stetson and Anna Yovu |
| 1:2020cv07002 |
| August 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the above-captioned Plaintiffs and Defendant that the time for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action, dated August 28, 2020, is extended to and includes November 6, 2020. This Stipulation may be executed in counterparts and facsimile signatures shall be deemed originals for purposes of this Stipulation. SO ORDERED. Charles Stetson answer due 11/6/2020. Motions terminated: #10 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #9 Stipulation and Order, Set Deadlines, addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Ally Hack dated October 14, 2020, filed by Charles Stetson. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 10/15/2020) (va)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #9 Stipulation and Order,,, Set Deadlines,, addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Ally Hack dated October 14, 2020. Document filed by Charles Stetson. (Attachments: #1 stipulation).(Hack, Ally) |
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the above-captioned Plaintiffs and Defendant that the time for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action, dated August 28, 2020, is extended to and includes October 15, 2020. This Stipulation may be executed in counterparts and facsimile signatures shall be deemed originals for purposes of this Stipulation. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 9/28/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO ANSWER. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the undersigned attorneys for the above-captioned Plaintiffs and Defendant that the time for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action, dated August 28, 2020, is extended to and includes October 15, 2020, and as further set forth in this Stipulation Enlarging Time to Answer. So ordered. Charles Stetson answer due 10/15/2020. Motions terminated: #7 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #5 Affidavit of Service Complaints, addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Ally Hack dated September 22, 2020. Document filed by Charles Stetson. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 9/23/2020) (rjm)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #5 Affidavit of Service Complaints, addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Ally Hack dated September 22, 2020. Document filed by Charles Stetson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit stipulation).(Hack, Ally) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: It is hereby: ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference by TELEPHONE on November 6, 2020, at 4:00 p.m. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts. Initial Conference set for 11/6/2020 at 04:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 9/15/2020) (va)
|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Charles Stetson served on 9/5/2020, answer due 9/28/2020. Service was accepted by Mrs. Stetson. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Nathan Yovu; Peter Stetson; Charles Stetson; Katherine Stetson; Anna Yovu; Jason Yovu..(Stewart, John) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Charles Stetson..(dnh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Charles Stetson, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Charles Stetson, Katherine Stetson, Peter Stetson, Anna Yovu, Jason Yovu, Nathan Yovu..(Stewart, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Stewart, John) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney John David Stewart. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Stetson. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21380619)Document filed by Nathan Yovu, Peter Stetson, Charles Stetson, Katherine Stetson, Anna Yovu, Jason Yovu..(Stewart, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
