Brady v. Gregory Sheindlin, Esq. et al
| James H. Brady |
| Gregory Sheindlin, Esq. and The Sheindlin Law Firm |
| 1:2020cv07047 |
| August 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from James H. Brady, dated 10/23/20 re: "REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT" - I will submit my Reply Brief on or before 11/23/20, and I am asking for the soonest possible Oral Argument date this Court can schedule after that. Document filed by James H. Brady.(sc) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants. The time to move or answer is extended to November 16, 2020. The initial pretrial conference is cancelled and will be rescheduled for a date after the motion to dismiss is resolved. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Lewis J. Liman)(Text Only Order) (Liman, Lewis)
|
|
ORDER: Defendants are ORDERED to notify the Pro Se Plaintiff of the previous order entered at dkt. #11 extending the time to answer and cancelling the initial pretrial conference. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Lewis J. Liman) (Text Only Order) (mf)
|
| Filing 10 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , file motion to dismiss and for sua sponte dismissal of action addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Gregory Sheindlin, Esq. dated 10/20/2020. Document filed by Gregory Sheindlin, Esq., The Sheindlin Law Firm. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Judge Engelmayers' Order, dated 09/08/2020 (ECF 51), #2 Exhibit Judge Engelmayer's Order, dated 09/08/2020 (ECF 50), #3 Exhibit Judge Wang's Report, dated 09/11/2020 (ECF 53), #4 Exhibit Judge Engelmayer's Order, dated 10/13/2020 (ECF 86)).(Sheindlin, Gregory) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gregory Evrett Sheindlin on behalf of Gregory Sheindlin, Esq., The Sheindlin Law Firm..(Sheindlin, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from J. Brady, dated 10/12/20 re: I ask that this Court reject any attempt by the Sheindlin Defendants of obtaining a Sua Sponte dismissal of the complaint before answering the complaint for the following reason: The Second Amended Complaint and Exhibits 2 and 3 prove conclusively that the Sheindlin Defendants used false instruments to steal over $1.7 million dollars from my wife and I on 9/5/18 etc. Document filed by James H. Brady.(sc) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint; served. Gregory Sheindlin, Esq., served on 9/30/2020, answer due 10/21/2020; The Sheindlin Law Firm served on 9/30/2020, answer due 10/21/2020. Service was made by U.S. Postal Mail and Electronic MAIL to Gregory Sheindlin, Esq. at gs@sheindlinlaw.com. Document filed by James H. Brady. (sc) |
| Filing 6 (2nd)AMENDED COMPLAINT, re: amending #2 Amended Complaint, against Gregory Sheindlin, Esq., The Sheindlin Law Firm with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by James H. Brady. Related document: #2 Amended Complaint,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(sc) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: It is hereby: ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference by TELEPHONE on November 6, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts. A copy of this notice will be mailed to Plaintiff by Chambers. Initial Conference set for 11/6/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 9/17/2020) (va) Modified on 9/22/2020 (va).
|
| Filing 4 LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from J. Brady, dated 9/14/20 re: Unfortunately, I have had a number of randomly assigned cases reassigned to other judges to my detriment. I am asking that this Court not permit this case to be reassigned to any other judge. Document filed by James H. Brady.(sc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by James H. Brady.(sc) |
| Mailed a copy of Summons Issued to James H. Brady at 510 Sicomac Ave. Wyckoff, NJ 07481. (bwa) |
| Transmission to Pro Se Assistants. Transmitted re: #3 Request for Issuance of Summons, to the Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Gregory Sheindlin, Esq., The Sheindlin Law Firm. (bwa) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $400.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 9/2/2020, Receipt Number 465401266023. (sw) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (ad) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (ad) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT, re: amending #1 Complaint against Gregory Sheindlin, Esq., The Sheindlin Law Firm with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by James H. Brady. Related document: #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(sc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gregory Sheindlin, Esq., The Sheindlin Law Firm. Document filed by James H. Brady. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
