Nanobeak Biotech Inc. v. Barbera
| NANOBEAK BIOTECH INC and Nanobeak Biotech Inc. |
| James Jeremy Barbera |
| 1:2020cv07080 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Louis L Stanton |
| Other Fraud |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
OPINION AND ORDER re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss filed by James Jeremy Barbera. Count I of the complaint for violation of the CFAA is dismissed. The remainder of the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 4/13/2021) (nb)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss. . Document filed by James Jeremy Barbera..(Cole, Adam) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss. . Document filed by Nanobeak Biotech Inc...(Gilbert, Michael) |
| Filing 12 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument Defendant's Request for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Louis L. Stanton from Adam D. Cole, Esq. dated September 23, 2020. Document filed by James Jeremy Barbera..(Cole, Adam) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss. Corrected Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by James Jeremy Barbera..(Cole, Adam) |
| Filing 10 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - (SEE #11) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by James Jeremy Barbera..(Cole, Adam) Modified on 9/23/2020 (lb). Modified on 9/23/2020 (kj). |
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Adam D. Cole, Esq. in Support re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss.. Document filed by James Jeremy Barbera. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Nanobeak Lawsuit).(Cole, Adam) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by James Jeremy Barbera..(Cole, Adam) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. James Jeremy Barbera served on 9/2/2020, answer due 9/23/2020. Service was accepted by James Jeremy Barbera, Defendant.. Document filed by Nanobeak Biotech Inc...(Gilbert, Michael) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Gilbert, Michael) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to James Jeremy Barbera..(dnh) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Michael J. Gilbert. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: NANOBEAK BIOTECH INC. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps. (dnh) |
| Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael J. Gilbert. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jury Demand code n (None); Dollar Demand omitted. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jury Demand code has been modified to p (Plaintiff); the Dollar Demand has been modified to $5,205,000. (dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Michael J. Gilbert to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the civil cover sheet is not correct; Only one Nature of Suit may be selected. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated June 2017. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated June 2017 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (dnh) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to James Jeremy Barbera, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by NANOBEAK BIOTECH INC..(Gilbert, Michael) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by NANOBEAK BIOTECH INC..(Gilbert, Michael) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Gilbert, Michael) Modified on 9/1/2020 (dnh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Jeremy Barbera. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21414578)Document filed by NANOBEAK BIOTECH INC..(Gilbert, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
