The Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund v. Laz Parking Ltd LLC
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund
Defendant: Laz Parking Ltd LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv07314
Filed: September 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Laz Parking Ltd LLC. Document filed by The Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Rumelt, Owen)
September 9, 2020 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Laz Parking Ltd LLC..(pne)
September 9, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (pne)
September 9, 2020 Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pne)
September 9, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pne)
September 8, 2020 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Laz Parking Ltd LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by The Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund..(Rumelt, Owen)
September 8, 2020 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by The Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund..(Rumelt, Owen)
September 8, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rumelt, Owen)
September 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Laz Parking Ltd LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21549130)Document filed by The Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund..(Rumelt, Owen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund v. Laz Parking Ltd LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laz Parking Ltd LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund
Represented By: Owen Marc Rumelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?