Jaber v. Hanley et al
| Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber |
| Ms. Christina Hanley, Ms. Andrea Lee Surratt, Ms. Sabrina P. Shroff and Ms. Colleen McMahon |
| 1:2020cv07347 |
| September 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Louis L Stanton |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 LETTER from J. Faouzi, dated 10/21/20 re: Sir, I have received legal mail from your Court signed by the Honorable Judge on 10/6/20. The first payment I made of $650 Dollars was not the amount, and it has been returned to me; and I must make a new payment of $400 Dollars. On 10/8/20, I gave the Counselor of my Unit(A4) the order of payment $400 Dollars and Legal Mail to send to your Court; and my Legal Mail was Certified Mail Receipt (7018 0040 0000 6220 9034) etc. Sir, I do not know if you have received my Legal Mail, and the statement of the last six months and the payment of $400 dollars, because the Judge said I have 30 days and that means until 11/6/20 etc. Document filed by Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber.(sc) Modified on 10/28/2020 (sc). |
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION & Prisoner Authorization: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application & Prisoner Authorization to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 10/30/2020. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 10/30/2020. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 9/30/2020) (Attachments: #1 IFP Application, #2 Prisoner Authorization) (keb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application, to Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber, Reg No. 75840054, Federal Correctional Complex-Medium, P.O. Box 1032, Coleman, FL 33521. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application, # 2 Prisoner Authorization) (dsh) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT, re: amending #1 Complaint against Christina Hanley, Colleen McMahon, Sabrina P. Shroff, Andrea Lee Surratt with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber. Related document: #1 Complaint.(sc) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
| CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK - Check Returned. Check in the amount of $450.00 returned to the U.S. Treasury because it was payable to the wrong court and in the wrong amount..(cde) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christina Hanley, Colleen McMahon, Sabrina P. Shroff, Andrea Lee Surratt. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number XXXXXXX)Document filed by Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
