Jackson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Shawn Jackson
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv07476
Filed: September 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration..(dnh)
October 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Shawn Jackson..(Gottesman, Josephine)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: In accordance with this Districts Standing Order governing challenges to denials of social security benefits (see In re: Mots. J. Pleadings Social Sec. Cases, 16-mc- 171), the following briefing schedule applies: Within 90 days of service, the Commissioner must serve and file the Electronic Certified Administrative Record (e-CAR), which constitutes the Commissioners answer, or otherwise move against the complaint. If Plaintiff wishes to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings, Plaintiff must do so within 60 days of the date on which the e-CAR was filed. The motion must contain a full recitation of the relevant facts and a full description of the underlying administrative proceeding. The Commissioner must file an answer brief within 60 days of the filing of Plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff may file a reply within 21 days thereafter. Additionally, to conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge. If both parties consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, counsel for the defendant must, within two weeks of the date on which Defendant enters an appearance, email to Oetken_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov a fully executive Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. If the court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before a Magistrate Judge rather than before me. If either party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks on which Defendant enters an appearance, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/15/2020) (js)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (sj)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Shawn Jackson..(Gottesman, Josephine)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Gottesman, Josephine)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Document filed by Shawn Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Appeals Council denial).(Gottesman, Josephine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Jackson
Represented By: Josephine Gottesman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?