In Re: Tapmasters Chelsea, LLC
| Amba-Laxmi Holdings LLC, Minal Joshi and Tejas Joshi |
| Tapmasters Chelsea, LLC |
| 1:2020cv07551 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Tapmasters Chelsea, LLC. Document filed by Amba-Laxmi Holdings LLC, Minal Joshi, Tejas Joshi. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Cohen, Mitchell) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - SIGNATURE ERROR - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Tapmasters Chelsea, LLC. Document filed by Amba-Laxmi Holdings LLC, Minal Joshi, Tejas Joshi. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Cohen, Mitchell) Modified on 9/18/2020 (km). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Mitchell Cohen. RE-FILE Document No. #4 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the stipulation needs to have handwritten signatures of the attorneys. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed PDF. (km) |
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #5 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was reviewed and referred to Judge Gregory H. Woods for approval for the following reason(s): the stipulation of dismissal is not pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (km) |
Filing 3
ORDER: This appeal has been assigned to me for all purposes. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8018, Appellant's brief must be served and filed by 30 days after the docketing of notice that the record has been transmitted or is available electronically, Appellee's brief must be served and filed within 30 days after service of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of Appellee's brief. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/16/2020) (mro)
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (bkar) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO THE S.D.N.Y. from the Order of Judge Michael E. Wiles dated August 21, 2020. Bankruptcy Court Case Numbers: 20-1086A, 16-B-12539 (MEW). Certified copies of file received.Document filed by Amba-Laxmi Holdings LLC, Minal Joshi, Tejas Joshi.(bkar) |
| Case Designated ECF. (bkar) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (bkar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
