ACS v. Malek
| ACS |
| Robert Malek |
| 1:2020cv07623 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE REMANDED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the State Court - Family Court Court of the State of New York, County of Kings. Sent certified copy of docket entries and remand order. Mailed via UPS Tracking Number 1Z E22 E53 21 1000 096 6 on 10/8/2020. (jwh) |
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Defendant and note service on the docket. The Court remands these actions under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) to the State of New York Family Court, City of New York, Kings County. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to that court and to close this action here. All pending matters are terminated. In light of the foregoing, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's motion to seal as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 5 and to strike the submission from the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/7/2020) (jwh) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 6 LETTER from Robert Malek, dated 10/6/20 re: "28 US 1443 AUTHORITY EXHIBITS & AMENDMENT" - Due to circumstances outlined in my most recent filing, I have been delayed in providing exhibits and additional information in support of my 28:1443 Claim. I will do so by 10/12/20 or before, at the least etc. Document filed by Robert Malek.(sc) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from R. Malek, re: The Following Pages & Flash Drive Represent: Book4/ Exhibit C1 Page 12 Is Hard to Read. I Reprinted & Put On Flash Drive etc. Document filed by Robert Malek.(sc) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ACS v. Malek | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ACS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert Malek | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
