Angeles v. Arbor Snowboards, Inc.
Jenisa Angeles |
Arbor Snowboards, Inc. |
1:2020cv07681 |
September 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Andrew L Carter |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATED NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to F.R C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, without costs or fees payable to either party. This stipulation may be executed in counterparts and facsimile or electronic execution hereof shall have the same effect and be treated as original. The Parties request that the Court So Order same. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 11/10/2020) (js) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Arbor Snowboards, Inc. and without costs. Document filed by Arbor Snowboards, Inc.. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Del Pizzo, Nancy) |
Filing 8 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Arbor Snowboards, Inc.. Document filed by Arbor Snowboards, Inc.. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Del Pizzo, Nancy) Modified on 11/9/2020 (km). |
***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #9 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was reviewed and referred to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. for approval for the following reason(s): the parties request that the Court so Order the document. (km) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Notice to Attorney Nancy Del Pizzo to RE-FILE Document #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Use the event type Other Filings, Other Documents, Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. (km) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Arbor Snowboards, Inc. served on 9/19/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. Service was accepted by Jason Sarayda. Document filed by Jenisa Angeles..(Force, David) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint. SO ORDERED. Arbor Snowboards, Inc. answer due 11/9/2020. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 10/8/2020) (jca) |
Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Nancy Del Pizzo dated October 7, 2020. Document filed by Arbor Snowboards, Inc...(Del Pizzo, Nancy) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Arbor Snowboards, Inc...(dnh) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Paul Force. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Jenisa Angeles. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (dnh) |
Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(dnh) |
Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Arbor Snowboards, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Jenisa Angeles..(Force, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Force, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arbor Snowboards, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21715193)Document filed by Jenisa Angeles..(Force, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Angeles v. Arbor Snowboards, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Arbor Snowboards, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Nancy Ann Del Pizzo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jenisa Angeles | |
Represented By: | David Paul Force |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.