Angeles v. Grove Collaborative, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jenisa Angeles
Defendant: Grove Collaborative, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv07684
Filed: September 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: The Court has been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. ECF No. 13. The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same sixty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/20/2020) (kv)
November 19, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Jenisa Angeles..(Rozenberg, Mark)
November 19, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mark Rozenberg on behalf of Jenisa Angeles..(Rozenberg, Mark)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re: #6 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference. Accordingly, the parties shall submit their joint letter and proposed case management plan by 12:00 p.m. on November 19, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/18/2020) (kv)
October 16, 2020 Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Grove Collaborative, Inc. served on 9/21/2020, answer due 11/30/2020. Service was accepted by LYNANNE GARES. Document filed by Jenisa Angeles..(Force, David)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #8 Letter filed by Grove Collaborative, Inc.. ENDORSEMENT: GRANTED in part, DENIED in part. By November 30, 2020, Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Defendant's request to adjourn the initial pretrial conference is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Grove Collaborative, Inc. answer due 11/30/2020. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 10/9/2020) (kv)
October 8, 2020 Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Khristoph Becker dated 10/08/2020 re: Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and Continuance of Initial Conference. Document filed by Grove Collaborative, Inc...(Becker, Khristoph)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 9/21/2020) (kv) Modified on 9/23/2020 (kv).
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear for an initial pretrial conference, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, at 10:20 a.m., on November 23, 2020, to be held telephonically. The parties are directed to dial 888-398-2342 or 215-861-0674, and enter access code 5598827. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Initial Conference set for 11/23/2020 at 10:20 AM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 9/21/2020) (kv)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 9/21/2020) (kv)
September 18, 2020 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Grove Collaborative, Inc...(dnh)
September 18, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(dnh)
September 18, 2020 Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh)
September 18, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (dnh)
September 18, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Paul Force. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Jenisa Angeles. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (dnh)
September 17, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Grove Collaborative, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Jenisa Angeles..(Force, David)
September 17, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Force, David)
September 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Grove Collaborative, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21715352)Document filed by Jenisa Angeles..(Force, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Angeles v. Grove Collaborative, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grove Collaborative, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jenisa Angeles
Represented By: David Paul Force
Represented By: Mark Rozenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?