Williams v. Saul
Dwayne Williams |
Andrew M. Saul |
Social Security Administration |
1:2020cv07825 |
September 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Sarah L Cave |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: By Order today, the Court is referring this case to Magistrate Judge Cave for a report and recommendation on any motion for judgment on the pleadings. To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before Magistrate Judge Cave. If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant must, within two weeks of the date of this Order, either mail or email to Failla_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order (and also available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consent-to-proceed-before-us-magistrate-judge). If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before Magistrate Judge Cave rather than before the undersigned. If either party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before Magistrate Judge Cave, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date of this Order advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. There will be no adverse consequences if the parties do not consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/18/2020) (rro) |
Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/18/20) (yv) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Susan Colleen Branagan on behalf of Andrew M. Saul..(Branagan, Susan) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Andrew M. Saul served on 10/27/2020. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Dwayne Williams..(Sobel, Marissa) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew M. Saul..(dnh) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 9/24/20) (yv) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Marissa Beth Sobel. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Andrew M. Saul. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attorneys for Defendant).(Sobel, Marissa) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Andrew M. Saul, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Dwayne Williams..(Sobel, Marissa) |
Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Dwayne Williams..(Sobel, Marissa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul. Document filed by Dwayne Williams. (Attachments: #1 Redacted unfavorable ALJ decision, #2 Redacted Appeals Council denial).(Sobel, Marissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.