Gonzalez Cruz v. Decker et al
| Nohasses Gonzalez Cruz |
| Thomas Decker, Chad F. Wolf, Director James McHenry, WILLIAM BARR and James McHenry |
| 1:2020cv07871 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Nohasses Gonzalez Cruz. ENDORSEMENT: The petitioner having been released from ICE custody, the petition is DISMISSED as moot. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/13/2020) (jca) |
| Filing 4 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Craig Relles dated 10/09/2020 re: Mootness. Document filed by Nohasses Gonzalez Cruz..(Relles, Craig) |
Filing 3
ORDER SCHEDULING AN INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: If a conforming case management plan is submitted at least two business days prior to the scheduled initial conference and subsequently approved by the Court, the initial conference will be canceled automatically. If a motion has been filed either before or after the case management plan is approved, and the parties desire a conference, a letter must be submitted to the Court via fax specifically asking that the initial conference not be canceled. If the parties fail to agree upon such a plan or fail to submit the plan to the Court within the time provided (at least two business days before the conference date), the parties must participate in a telephone conference on 12/18/2020 at 10:00 a.m. Parties should dial in at 1(888)363-4749, access code (9054506) to join the conference, as further set forth. (Telephone Conference set for 12/18/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Colleen McMahon. Initial Conference set for 12/18/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Colleen McMahon.) (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/8/2020) (mml)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Craig Relles. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: WILLIAM BARR; Thomas Decker ; James McHenry ; Chad F. Wolf. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party text was omitted. (dnh) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Colleen McMahon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(dnh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Relles, Craig) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. (Filing Fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21812668)Document filed by Nohasses Gonzalez Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit).(Relles, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
