Lora Cruz v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Natalicia A. Lora Cruz |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv07939 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Re-Mailed a copy of #4 Order Granting IFP Application, to Natalicia A. Lora Cruz at 760 Melrose Av., Apt. 4M, Bronx, NY 10451. (aan) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Jud ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 10/2/2020) (ks) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/6/2020) (ks). ge Ronnie Abrams on 10/2/2020) (ks) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/6/2020) (ks).
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order Granting IFP Application, to Natalicia A. Lora Cruz at 760 Melrose Av., Apt. 4M, Bronx, NY 10451. (dsh) |
| Mailed a copy of #3 Standing Order re Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings in Social Security Cases, to Natalicia A. Lora Cruz at 760 Melrose Av., Apt. 4M, Bronx, NY 10451. (dsh) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/16) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Natalicia A. Lora Cruz..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Natalicia A. Lora Cruz..(rdz) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
