Root Four Imagination Inc. v. Identifix Inc.
Plaintiff: Root Four Imagination Inc.
Defendant: Identifix Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv08077
Filed: September 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Naomi Reice Buchwald
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Identifix Inc.. Document filed by Root Four Imagination Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Wright, Oksana)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: granting #12 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application Granted. SO ORDERED. Identifix Inc. answer due 11/6/2020. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 10/22/2020) (ama)
October 21, 2020 Filing 12 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from Jonathan D. Pressment dated October 21, 2020. Document filed by Identifix Inc...(Pressment, Jonathan)
October 21, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Abbey Gauger on behalf of Identifix Inc...(Gauger, Abbey)
October 21, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan David Pressment on behalf of Identifix Inc...(Pressment, Jonathan)
October 9, 2020 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Identifix Inc. served on 10/2/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. Service was accepted by SEAN YAN. Document filed by Root Four Imagination Inc...(Langer, Philip)
October 1, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Philip Langer on behalf of Root Four Imagination Inc...(Langer, Philip)
October 1, 2020 Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Wright, Oksana)
October 1, 2020 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Identifix Inc...(jgo)
October 1, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
October 1, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Oksana Gaussy Wright. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of U.S.; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (jgo)
October 1, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
October 1, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Oksana Gaussy Wright to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF was not signed by the attorney;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated June 2017. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated June 2017 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo)
October 1, 2020 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
September 30, 2020 Filing 8 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault..(jus)
September 30, 2020 Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Root Four Imagination Inc...(Wright, Oksana)
September 30, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Identifix Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Root Four Imagination Inc...(Wright, Oksana)
September 30, 2020 Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Wright, Oksana) Modified on 10/1/2020 (jgo).
September 30, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Identifix Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21910250)Document filed by Root Four Imagination Inc...(Wright, Oksana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Root Four Imagination Inc. v. Identifix Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Root Four Imagination Inc.
Represented By: Oksana Gaussy Wright
Represented By: Philip Langer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Identifix Inc.
Represented By: Abbey Gauger
Represented By: Jonathan David Pressment
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?