Barshay v. Naithani
Plaintiff: Yan Barshay
Defendant: Naithani Mahesh and Mahesh Naithani
Case Number: 1:2020cv08579
Filed: October 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Katherine Polk Failla
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ds
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: #8 Letter filed by Yan Barshay. ENDORSEMENT: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's above response to Defendant's November 23, 2020, letter indicating its intent to file a motion to dismiss (Dkt. #6). The parties are hereby ORDERED to appear for a telephone conference regarding the motion on December 16, 2020, at 3:00 p.m. The dial-in information is as follows: At 3:00 p.m. the parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Please note, the conference will not be available prior to 3:00 p.m. SO ORDERED., ( Telephone Conference set for 12/16/2020 at 03:00 PM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/03/2020) (ama)
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Gregory A. Sioris dated December 2, 2020 re: Reply to request for pre motion conference. Document filed by Yan Barshay..(Sioris, Gregory)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Owen Richard Wolfe on behalf of Mahesh Naithani..(Wolfe, Owen)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 LETTER MOTION for Conference / Pre-Motion Conference addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Jeremy A. Cohen dated November 23, 2020. Document filed by Mahesh Naithani..(Cohen, Jeremy)
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Mahesh Naithani served on 11/2/2020, answer due 11/23/2020. Service was accepted by Mahesh Naithani. Document filed by Yan Barshay..(Sioris, Gregory)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Mahesh Naithani..(pc)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (pc)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Gregory Alexander Sioris. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Naithani Mahesh. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error;. (pc)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Gregory Alexander Sioris. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $250,000,000; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $250,000; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (pc)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Yan Barshay, Mahesh Naithani, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Yan Barshay..(Sioris, Gregory)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sioris, Gregory)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Naithani Mahesh. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number BNYSDC-22136458)Document filed by Yan Barshay..(Sioris, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barshay v. Naithani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Naithani Mahesh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mahesh Naithani
Represented By: Owen Richard Wolfe
Represented By: Jeremy Andrew Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yan Barshay
Represented By: Gregory Alexander Sioris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?