Delkeskamp v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kellie Delkeskamp
Defendant: UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv08643
Filed: October 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Gregory H Woods
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2020 Filing 10 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #9 Letter, filed by UBS Financial Services, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted in part. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to January 8, 2021. However, the Court declines to set a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss at this time. The Court will establish the briefing schedule for any proposed motion to dismiss at the pre-motion conference required pursuant to the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. (UBS Financial Services, Inc. answer due 1/8/2021.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 11/6/2020) (rro)
November 5, 2020 Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Tammy L. Roy dated November 5, 2020 re: accompanying stipulated scheduling order. Document filed by UBS Financial Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order - Stipulation and Proposed Scheduling Order).(Roy, Tammy)
November 5, 2020 Filing 8 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent UBS AG, Corporate Parent UBS Group AG, Corporate Parent UBS Americas Holding LLC, Corporate Parent UBS Americas Inc. for UBS Financial Services, Inc.. Document filed by UBS Financial Services, Inc...(Roy, Tammy)
November 5, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nicholas Noyes Matuschak on behalf of UBS Financial Services, Inc...(Matuschak, Nicholas)
November 5, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tammy Lynn Roy on behalf of UBS Financial Services, Inc...(Roy, Tammy)
October 20, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 1/21/2021 at 04:30 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Court's website, for the dial-in number and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of the Court's Emergency Rules. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/20/2020) (mro)
October 19, 2020 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to UBS Financial Services, Inc...(jgo)
October 19, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
October 19, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Timothy John MacFall. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 28:1330; County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1332; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (jgo)
October 19, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
October 19, 2020 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Timothy John MacFall. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Kellie Delkeskamp. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo)
October 19, 2020 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
October 16, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to UBS Financial Services, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kellie Delkeskamp..(MacFall, Timothy)
October 16, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(MacFall, Timothy)
October 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UBS Financial Services, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22174789)Document filed by Kellie Delkeskamp..(MacFall, Timothy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Delkeskamp v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Represented By: Tammy Lynn Roy
Represented By: Nicholas Noyes Matuschak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kellie Delkeskamp
Represented By: Timothy John MacFall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?