Pacific Indemnity Company v. Kiton Corporation
Pacific Indemnity Company |
Kiton Corporation |
1:2020cv08667 |
October 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Paul A Engelmayer |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 dj |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Daren S. McNally. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Daren S. McNally. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Pacific Indemnity Company; Kiton Corporation. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly. (sj) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(McNally, Daren) |
Filing 2 FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Chubb Limited, Corporate Parent Chubb INA Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Chubb Group Holdings Inc. for Pacific Indemnity Company. Document filed by Pacific Indemnity Company..(McNally, Daren) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kiton Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22179341)Document filed by Pacific Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A- Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B -Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C-Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D-Notice of Voluntary Dismissal).(McNally, Daren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pacific Indemnity Company v. Kiton Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kiton Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pacific Indemnity Company | |
Represented By: | Daren S. McNally |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.