Chan v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
| Shi-May Chan |
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv08831 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(DiPrinzio, Carol) |
| Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. Document filed by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(DiPrinzio, Carol) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's application for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, Dkt. No. 9, is granted. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to December 19, 2020. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Gregory H. Woods)(Text Only Order) (Woods, Gregory)
|
| Filing 9 EMERGENCY LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Carol A. DiPrinzio dated November 17, 2020. Document filed by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(DiPrinzio, Carol) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carol Ann DiPrinzio on behalf of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(DiPrinzio, Carol) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. served on 10/27/2020, answer due 11/17/2020. Service was accepted by Gina Martinez - Message Center Manager. Document filed by Shi-May Chan..(Pierre, Abel) |
|
Filing 6
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that this case is referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties are hereby notified that Local Rule 83.9 shall govern the mediation and are directed to participate in the mediation in good faith. The mediation should take place at least two weeks prior to the Initial Pretrial Conference, which is currently scheduled for February 3, 2021 at 4:30 p.m. by separate Order to be entered today. The mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling Order issued by this Court without leave of this Court. Mediators will be assigned based on the nature of suit. Additional expertise requests should promptly be directed to the Mediation Office. SO ORDERED. Please reference the following when corresponding with the Mediation Office. E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone (212) 805-0643, and facsimile (212) 805-0647. Mediator to be Assigned by 11/5/2020. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/25/2020) (mro)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 2/3/2021 at 04:30 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Court's website, for the dial-in number and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of the Court's Emergency Rules. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/25/2020) (mro) (Main Document 5 replaced on 10/26/2020) (mro). |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Shi-May Chan..(Pierre, Abel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Pierre, Abel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22263962)Document filed by Shi-May Chan..(Pierre, Abel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chan v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Carol Ann DiPrinzio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shi-May Chan | |
| Represented By: | Abel Luc Pierre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
