Giannetta v. Johnson
| Alice Lee Giannetta |
| Tana Johnson |
| 1:2020cv09016 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Engelmayer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER OR MAKE ANY MOTION WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPLAINT: IT IS STIPULATED by and between the undersigned, plaintiff pro se and counsel for Defendant, that the date by which Defendant must answer or make any motion with respect to the complaint is extended through and including January 20, 2021. SO ORDERED., Tana Johnson answer due 1/20/2021. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/22/2020) (ama)
|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Tana Johnson..(Steiner, Leonard) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint served. Tana Johnson, served on 11/30/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. Service was accepted by Tana Johnson. Document filed by Alice Lee Giannetta. (sc) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tana Johnson. (aan) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/20/2020) (aan). |
| Mailed a copy of #4 Summons Issued to Alice Lee Giannetta 77W 55th St. Apt. 12B New York, NY 10019. (aan) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (bcu) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $400.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 11/19/2020, Receipt Number 465401270123. (jgl) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Tana Johnson, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Alice Lee Giannetta. (sc) |
| Transmission to Pro Se Assistants. Transmitted re: #3 Request for Issuance of Summons, to the Pro Se Assistants for processing.(sc) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Alice Giannetta consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Alice Lee Giannetta.(sc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tana Johnson. Document filed by Alice Lee Giannetta..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) Modified on 10/28/2020 (rdz). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Giannetta v. Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alice Lee Giannetta | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tana Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
