Gingiber LLC et al v. Rauch Industries, Inc.
| Gingiber LLC and Stacie D. Bloomfield |
| Rauch Industries, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv09046 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul G Gardephe |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Rauch Industries, Inc. served on 12/2/2020, answer due 12/23/2020. Service was accepted by Tyler Cannizzaro, Intake Specialist for Incorporating Services, Ltd.. Document filed by Gingiber LLC; Stacie D. Bloomfield..(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rauch Industries, Inc...(jgo) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF AMENDED SUMMONS as to Rauch Industries, Inc., re: #11 Amended Complaint,. Document filed by Stacie D. Bloomfield, Gingiber LLC..(Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint, against Rauch Industries, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Gingiber LLC, Stacie D. Bloomfield. Related document: #1 Complaint,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2- Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand Letter).(Rothman, Joel) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Joel Benjamin Rothman to RE-FILE Document No. #10 Request for Issuance of Amended Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): summons request was not processed due to deficient pleading;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Joel Benjamin Rothman to RE-FILE Document No. #9 Amended Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected;. Re-file the pleading using the event type Amended Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (jgo) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF AMENDED SUMMONS as to Rauch Industries, Inc., re: #9 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Stacie D. Bloomfield, Gingiber LLC..(Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 9 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint, against Gingiber LLC, Stacie D. Bloomfield with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Gingiber LLC, Stacie D. Bloomfield. Related document: #1 Complaint,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2- Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand Letter).(Rothman, Joel) Modified on 11/9/2020 (jgo). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 2/11/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 705, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 10/31/2020) (kv) Modified on 11/2/2020 (kv). |
| Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 6 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (sj) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rauch Industries, Inc.. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Joel Benjamin Rothman. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Stacie D. Bloomfield, Gingiber LLC..(Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 3 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review..(Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Rauch Industries, Inc., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Stacie D. Bloomfield, Gingiber LLC..(Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rauch Industries, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number BNYSDC-22354163)Document filed by Gingiber LLC, Stacie D. Bloomfield. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand Letters, #4 Civil Cover Sheet).(Rothman, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
