Nocks v. MobileIron, Inc. et al
Evan Nocks |
Tae Hea Nahm, Jessica Denecour, Kenneth Klein, Simon Biddiscombe, James Tolonen, MobileIron, Inc., Anjali Joshi and Rishi Bajaj |
1:2020cv09088 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Lewis J Liman |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Rishi Bajaj, Simon Biddiscombe, Jessica Denecour, Anjali Joshi, Kenneth Klein, MobileIron, Inc., Tae Hea Nahm, James Tolonen. Document filed by Evan Nocks. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Kuehn, Justin) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: It is hereby: ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference by TELEPHONE on December 30, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by one week prior to conference, the parties in all related cases 20cv08767, 20cv09088, and 20cv09205 are to confer and jointly submit to the Court a proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order. A template is available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-lewis-j-liman. This document should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, which are available on the same webpage. Parties should consult the Individual Practices for guidance on the matters to be discussed at the Initial Pretrial Conference and for the Court's rules with respect to communications with Chambers and other procedural matters. Counsel for Plaintiff is ordered to notify Defendants of this Notice. SO ORDERED.( Initial Conference set for 12/30/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 11/16/20) (yv) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (wb) |
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:20-cv-08767-LJL. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb) |
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Lewis J. Liman as possibly related to 20cv8767. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(pc) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 20cv8767. Document filed by Evan Nocks..(Kuehn, Justin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kuehn, Justin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rishi Bajaj, Simon Biddiscombe, Jessica Denecour, Anjali Joshi, Kenneth Klein, MobileIron, Inc., Tae Hea Nahm, James Tolonen. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22370832)Document filed by Evan Nocks..(Kuehn, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.