Ghouneim v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Debbie Ghouneim
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv09303
Filed: November 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Kevin Nathaniel Fox
Referring Judge: Alison J Nathan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties comply with the Standing Order in re Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings that appears at Docket Entry No. 3 on the docket sheet maintained for this action by the Clerk of Court. The plaintiff is directed to advise the Clerk of Court expeditiously, via the court's Pro Se Unit, which is located at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007, of her contact information to ensure that all court communications are provided to her. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 12/4/2020) (va)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Order (Dkt. No. 7) served on Debbie Ghouneim on November 25, 2020. Service was made by Express Mail. Document filed by Social Security Administration..(Parsels, Amanda)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal and Notification of Removal served on Debbie Ghouneim on November 6, 2020. Service was made by Express Mail. Document filed by Social Security Administration..(Parsels, Amanda)
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall, on or before December 1, 2020, file proof that the Notice of Removal from Civil Court of the City of New York to this court was served on the plaintiff, as required by 28 U.S.C. 1446(d). The defendant is also directed to serve a copy of this order on the plaintiff and file proof of such service with the Clerk of Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 11/24/2020) (va)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/2020) (va)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: By separate order, the Court has assigned this case to the assigned Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on any motion for judgment on the pleadings. To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer to discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant must, within two weeks of the date on which Defendant notices an appearance, ECF file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge, rather than before the undersigned. Any appeal would be taken directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so-ordered. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this Order. If either party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date on which Defendant notices an appearance, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/2020) (ama)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/2020) (ama)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on April 20, 2016) (sj)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (sj)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Parsels, Amanda)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York. Case Number: CV-003910-20/NY..Document filed by Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A).(Parsels, Amanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ghouneim v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debbie Ghouneim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Amanda Frances Parsels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?